nanog mailing list archives
Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?)
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 16:03:39 -0700
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:16 AM Scott Christopher <sc () ottie org> wrote:
[...]
It's not about $BIGCORP having lots of corporate lawyers imposing its will on the small guys - it's about Amazon's role as a public utility, upon which many many many important things depend. S.C.
I must have missed the news amidst all the interest rate changes and tariff tweets... ...apparently Amazon has become a public utility now? I look forward with bemusement to the PUC tariff filings for AWS pricing. ^_^;; Matt
Current thread:
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?), (continued)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Rich Kulawiec (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Henry Yen (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) James R Cutler (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Bruce H McIntosh (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Dan Hollis (Aug 15)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Rich Kulawiec (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) John Curran (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) John Curran (Aug 04)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Rubens Kuhl (Aug 04)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Scott Christopher (Aug 05)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Matthew Petach (Aug 09)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Stephen Satchell (Aug 09)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Matthew Petach (Aug 13)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Stephen Satchell (Aug 13)