nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:19:10 -0700
https://www.wired.com/story/new-encryption-service-adds-privacy-protection-for-web-browsing/ On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 5:08 PM, <nop () imap cc> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:Very disappointing to see a popular prefix being allocated/reseved for research then being allocated to a company without public consultation. I am sure APNIC community will ask APNIC Sr. management for an explanation. This prefix , if it will be given to any business , should go thru a transparent bidding process OR regular APNIC allocation process transprently.From what I can tell, this has not been "allocated" (probably closer to a LOA)? All contacts and maintainers on the inetnum object are still APNIC's, Cloudflare does not have free access to do whatever they want here.
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? James R Cutler (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Igor Krneta (Mar 29)
- Re: Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Filip Hruska (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Eric Tykwinski (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Niels Bakker (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jared Mauch (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Christopher Morrow (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? nop (Mar 31)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mehmet Akcin (Mar 31)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jimmy Hess (Mar 31)