nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: Igor Krneta <warlord () teol net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:13:00 +0200
From 1.1.1.1 website: Cloudflare DNS resolver: ** * For IPv4:*1.1.1.1*and/or*1.0.0.1* * For IPv6:*2001:2001::*and/or*2001:2001:2001::* Its catchy enough for IPV6 :). On 29.3.2018 15:07, Chip Marshall wrote:
I think the real question is "when are we going to get some memorable IPv6 public recursive DNS servers?" 2001:4860:4860::8888 or 2620:fe::fe just aren't quite as catchy as 8.8.8.8 or 9.9.9.9.
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mike Hammett (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Izaac (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Seth Mattinen (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jared Mauch (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Hank Nussbacher (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Seth Mattinen (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mark Milhollan (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? James R Cutler (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Igor Krneta (Mar 29)
- Re: Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Filip Hruska (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Eric Tykwinski (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Niels Bakker (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? nop (Mar 31)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mehmet Akcin (Mar 31)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jimmy Hess (Mar 31)