nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 21:18:05 +0000
Joining the party late. Very disappointing to see a popular prefix being allocated/reseved for research then being allocated to a company without public consultation. I am sure APNIC community will ask APNIC Sr. management for an explanation. This prefix , if it will be given to any business , should go thru a transparent bidding process OR regular APNIC allocation process transprently. Geoff? Paul? Any chance you can give insight? On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:04 PM Payam Poursaied <me () payam124 com> wrote:
dig google.com @1.1.1.1 Cloudflare? Didn't find any news around it
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mark Milhollan (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? James R Cutler (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Igor Krneta (Mar 29)
- Re: Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Filip Hruska (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Eric Tykwinski (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Niels Bakker (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jared Mauch (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Christopher Morrow (Mar 28)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? nop (Mar 31)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mehmet Akcin (Mar 31)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jimmy Hess (Mar 31)