nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 12:06:27 -0700
That’s a wonderful theory. However, in practice, it’s a bit different. GDPR eliminates or at the very least complicates the maintenance of directory services. If past experience is any guide, once something becomes sufficiently difficult to maintain while complying with regulation, said thing eventually ceases to exist at least in any meaningful or useful form. It is not at all unlikely that this will be the inevitable consequence of GDPR when it comes to whois and thus, it is not at all unlikely that the scenario Hank described may be an (admittedly unintended, but very likely) outcome of GDPR. Owen
On Jun 4, 2018, at 09:30 , McBride, Mack <C-Mack.McBride () charter com> wrote: That would be real time information involving 'essential' activities. GDPR would not prevent determining the source of an attack. GDPR specifically doesn't protect anyone involved in criminal activity nor contradict any regulatory requirement (which covers cyber attacks). Mack -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Johnny Eriksson Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 12:24 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Hank Nussbacher wrote:The entire whois debacle will only get resolved when some hackers attack www.eugdpr.org, ec.europa.eu and some other key .eu sites. When the response they get will be "sorry, we can't determine who is attacking you since that contravenes GDPR", will the EU light bulb go on that something in GDPR needs to be tweaked.You seem to assume that said light bulb does in fact exist.-Hank--Johnny /\_/\ ( *.* )^ <E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit, (continued)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 04)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 05)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Rubens Kuhl (Jun 05)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 05)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit William Herrin (Jun 01)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Stephen Satchell (Jun 01)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Randy Bush (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit bzs (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Dan Hollis (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Rubens Kuhl (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Hank Nussbacher (Jun 05)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Mike Meredith (Jun 06)