nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:58:22 -0700
On Jun 3, 2018, at 22:44 , Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> wrote:Yeah, what Niels is really leaving out here is the open question of whether or not GDPR will eventually lead to the destruction of Peering DB. OwenOf course it will not. We just need to accept that only roles not people are published. Those people will change job anyway and nobody updates whois. GDPR does not apply to companies, so you can still publish the owner of domains and IP prefixes as company names with contact information. Regards Baldur
Much of the information in Peering DB is people. In fact, IIRC, peering DB doesn’t really have “role” accounts. Peering DB is unrelated to whois. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit niels=nanog (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Hank Nussbacher (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Stephen Satchell (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit John Peach (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit niels=nanog (Jun 01)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Rodney Joffe (Jun 03)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Owen DeLong (Jun 03)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 03)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 04)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 04)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Daniel Corbe (Jun 05)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Baldur Norddahl (Jun 04)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 05)
- Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit Rubens Kuhl (Jun 05)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 05)
- RE: ICANN GDPR lawsuit McBride, Mack (Jun 04)