nanog mailing list archives
Re: Broadcast television in an IP world
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 07:14:28 +0900
On 2017/11/21 4:22, William Herrin wrote:
Does multicast have any future?
Combined with bandwidth guarantee or prioritization, yes.
We're somehow going to beef up the routers to allow non-paying third parties to fine-tune down to the video stream? Not happening.
It is merely that third parties should pay ISPs offering multicast service for them. Amount of payment should be proportional to bandwidth used and area covered. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world, (continued)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Keith Medcalf (Nov 18)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Kraig Beahn (Nov 18)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Jay Hennigan (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Brandon Martin (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Baldur Norddahl (Nov 18)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Kevin Burke (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Jay Hennigan (Nov 17)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Aaron Gould (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Leo Bicknell (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world William Herrin (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Masataka Ohta (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Masataka Ohta (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Baldur Norddahl (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world K. Scott Helms (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Baldur Norddahl (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Mike Hammett (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Baldur Norddahl (Nov 21)