RE: Broadcast television in an IP world

["Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf () dessus com>]

Looks OK on my old 12" 240i interlace CRT.  However, it is not High Definition.  Like everything on the Roku it is 
CATRS (Compressed All To Rat Shit) and motion decimated and unsuitable for display on anything bigger/more modern than 
a 12 240i CRT circa 1980 or so, and certainly completely unwatchable on a 80" 1080p display.

And one cannot look at that SyncBak page unless one disables security and permits unwashed code free reign to execute 
willy nilly on the local computer.  I do not have the time nor inclination to security audit their code, so there is 
nothing to be seen from them.  This means on a balance of probabilities  that they are nothing more than snake-oil 
salesmen.

---
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Kraig Beahn
> Sent: Saturday, 18 November, 2017 07:14
> To: Luke Guillory
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: Broadcast television in an IP world
>
> The OTT side is already being implemented by a major broadcast
> customer of
> ours.
>
> Right now they simply rebroadcast their news, both live and
> prerecorded,
> i'm assuming until the national networks and syndicators will allow
> reasonable OTT licensing fee's.
>
> They use a product called SyncBak (for which they've also invested in
> heavily) and offer the streams for all of their market stations
> nationwide.
> You can in turn use a Roku or Roku like STB to ascertain the feed,
> live and
> in HD at that.
>
> We currently provide the fiber and peering facilities, and are
> intimately
> familiar with the network and video production side.
>
> Very neat product, at that...
>
> IP translator and MPEG network side:
> http://www.syncbak.com
>
> Example station: https://channelstore.roku.com/details/47424/wctv
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 17, 2017 7:53 PM, "Luke Guillory" <lguillory () reservetele com>
> wrote:
>
> > Because local OTA channels are probably most of what people want
> live
> > outside of sporting events.
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2017, at 6:49 PM, Baldur Norddahl
> <baldur.norddahl () gmail com<
> > mailto:baldur.norddahl () gmail com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Much live programming could be done without significant additional
> burden
> > if the community could agree on multicast delivery standards.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Does multicast have any future? Netflix, YouTube, et al does not
> use it.
> > People want instant replay and a catalogue to select from. Except
> for sport
> > events, live TV has no advantage so why even try to optimize for
> it?
> > Luke Guillory
> > Vice President – Technology and Innovation
> >
> >
> >         [cid:image4d387c.JPG@67228580.4c8bfb6f]
> <http://www.rtconline.com>
> > Tel:    985.536.1212
> > Fax:    985.536.0300
> > Email:  lguillory () reservetele com
> > Web:    www.rtconline.com
> >
> >         Reserve Telecommunications
> > 100 RTC Dr
> > Reserve, LA 70084
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Disclaimer:
> > The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended
> only for
> > the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> > confidential and/or privileged material which should not
> disseminate,
> > distribute or be copied. Please notify Luke Guillory immediately by
> e-mail
> > if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail
> from
> > your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure
> or
> > error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
> destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory
> therefore does
> > not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of
> this
> > message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.