nanog mailing list archives
Re: Broadcast television in an IP world
From: Luke Guillory <lguillory () reservetele com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 13:58:07 +0000
I’m not paying anything for local resources with regards to local edge delivery, that’s capital expenditures not MRCs. Our edge networks aren’t unlimited or free, so while it’s not costing me on the transit side there still are cost in terms of upgrades and so on. My point is that In some networks such as docsis conserving edge resources can be helped with multicast. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 21, 2017, at 4:12 AM, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com<mailto:baldur.norddahl () gmail com>> wrote: Den 21. nov. 2017 00.42 skrev "Luke Guillory" <lguillory () reservetele com<mailto:lguillory () reservetele com>>: Why would an ISP not want to conserve edge resources? If I’m doing iptv I’m better off doing multicast which would conserve loads of BW for something popular like the Super Bowl. Especially if I’m doing this over docsis. You pay for 95th percentile. If that is decided by everyone watching Game of Thrones one day, then using the same resources for Super Bowl the next day will be for free. Luke Guillory Vice President – Technology and Innovation [cid:imagef9b835.JPG@242ea556.429501f5] <http://www.rtconline.com> Tel: 985.536.1212 Fax: 985.536.0300 Email: lguillory () reservetele com Web: www.rtconline.com Reserve Telecommunications 100 RTC Dr Reserve, LA 70084 Disclaimer: The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material which should not disseminate, distribute or be copied. Please notify Luke Guillory immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
Current thread:
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world, (continued)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Kevin Burke (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Jay Hennigan (Nov 17)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Aaron Gould (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Leo Bicknell (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world William Herrin (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Masataka Ohta (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Masataka Ohta (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Baldur Norddahl (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world K. Scott Helms (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Baldur Norddahl (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Mike Hammett (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Baldur Norddahl (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Mike Hammett (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Baldur Norddahl (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Mike Hammett (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world K. Scott Helms (Nov 22)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Greg Shepherd (Nov 21)