nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69?
From: John Kemp <kemp () network-services uoregon edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:51:08 -0500
I would like to see the session continue in some form. Social was close to good. The peering presentations weren't as useful to me personally. They sometimes made the time for actual peering conversations too short. The extra food and drinks were not important to me personally. ... Perhaps an "extended break" 45 minutes, with typical break food, and no presentations. Or if you want, a *silent* rolling slide show on a screen, with 1-slide per submitter, for peering news items or general peering requests... Cheaper... quieter... shorter... But having all the people in the same room at the same time for the same purpose, usually pretty useful. 2 cents, John Kemp On 2/6/17 9:17 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
Hi Bob, This was inadvertent and we will bring this back for NANOG 70. Regards, -Dave On Feb 6, 2017, 6:58 PM -0500, Bob Evans <bob () fiberinternetcenter com>, wrote:I suggest in the future NOT to get rid of something because a new method is attempted. I.E nanog had a nice method of identifying potential and existing peers with a simple green dot at registration to indicate an individual was involved with BGP in their company. That went away and today there is nothing. Cost of implementation was less than 5 dollars at any office supply retailer. Just a thought. Thank You Bob Evans CTOThe Peering Personals has been shelved while we try to figure out a better option. There was no peering content submitted to the Program Committee that justified a separate track, and so they chose to include the content in the general session throughout the program. Regards, -Dave On Feb 6, 2017, 8:12 AM -0500, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>, wrote:I'm squinting at the Guidebook for NANOG69, and I don't seem to see any peering BOF or peering social this time around. Am I being blind again, and it's on the agenda somewhere but I'm just overlooking it? Pointers in the right direction would be appreciated. Thanks! :) Matt
Current thread:
- Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Matthew Petach (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Bob Evans (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Dave Temkin (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Jay Hanke (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Mehmet Akcin (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Bob Evans (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Dave Temkin (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? John Kemp (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Dave Temkin (Feb 07)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Jay Hanke (Feb 06)