nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69?
From: Dave Temkin <dave () temk in>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:06:17 -0500
The Peering Personals has been shelved while we try to figure out a better option. There was no peering content submitted to the Program Committee that justified a separate track, and so they chose to include the content in the general session throughout the program. Regards, -Dave On Feb 6, 2017, 8:12 AM -0500, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>, wrote:
I'm squinting at the Guidebook for NANOG69, and I don't seem to see any peering BOF or peering social this time around. Am I being blind again, and it's on the agenda somewhere but I'm just overlooking it? Pointers in the right direction would be appreciated. Thanks! :) Matt
Current thread:
- Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Matthew Petach (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Bob Evans (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Dave Temkin (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Jay Hanke (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Mehmet Akcin (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Bob Evans (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Dave Temkin (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? John Kemp (Feb 06)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Dave Temkin (Feb 07)
- Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69? Jay Hanke (Feb 06)