Re: Peering BOF/Peering social @NANOG69?

[Jay Hanke <jayhanke () gmail com>]

The peering social at previous NANOG meetings has been excellent and
very useful. As you mentioned, the peering personals are perhaps not
as valuable. It would be great to see the social portion come back in
some form.

Jay

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Dave Temkin <dave () temk in> wrote:
> The Peering Personals has been shelved while we try to figure out a better option.
>
> There was no peering content submitted to the Program Committee that justified a separate track, and so they chose to 
> include the content in the general session throughout the program.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Dave
>
> On Feb 6, 2017, 8:12 AM -0500, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>, wrote:
> > I'm squinting at the Guidebook for NANOG69,
> > and I don't seem to see any peering BOF or
> > peering social this time around. Am I being
> > blind again, and it's on the agenda somewhere
> > but I'm just overlooking it?
> > Pointers in the right direction would be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks! :)
> >
> > Matt