nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?
From: Bryant Townsend <bryant () backconnect com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:04:09 -0700
@Blake - I think you misinterpreted my remarks of how this experience will shape the future company policy. I meant to portray that the company will not use these tactics again and that any future threats will be handled differently.
Current thread:
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?, (continued)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hank Nussbacher (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Tom Beecher (Sep 18)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Justin Paine via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Tom Beecher (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryant Townsend (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryant Townsend (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 15)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)