nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:32:56 -0700
--- bryant () backconnect com wrote: From: Bryant Townsend <bryant () backconnect com> @ca & Matt - No, we do not plan to ever intentionally perform a non-authorized BGP hijack in the future. -------------------------------------------- Bryant, Who was the upstream provider? scott
Current thread:
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?, (continued)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Ca By (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Blake Hudson (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hank Nussbacher (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Tom Beecher (Sep 18)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Justin Paine via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Tom Beecher (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryant Townsend (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryant Townsend (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 15)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)