nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:34:31 +0200
On 10/Nov/16 12:54, Zbyněk Pospíchal wrote:
In theory, yes. In the real world operators need MPLS label distribution, which is still not supported in many implementations.
But dual-stack protocol support in the IGP has nothing to do with MPLS. Now, if you're talking about LDPv6 or SR, then... Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?, (continued)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Wayne Bouchard (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? James Bensley (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 11)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Nick Hilliard (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? sthaug (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)