nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
From: "Zbyněk Pospíchal" <zbynek () dialtelecom cz>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:54:38 +0100
Dne 10.11.16 v 11:17 James Bensley wrote:
* Integrated IPv4/IPv6 protocol support in a single IGP implementation.This is in OSPv3.
In theory, yes. In the real world operators need MPLS label distribution, which is still not supported in many implementations. Regards, Zbynek
Current thread:
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?, (continued)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? David Bass (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Wayne Bouchard (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? James Bensley (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Zbyněk Pospíchal (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 11)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? Nick Hilliard (Nov 10)
- Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why? sthaug (Nov 10)