nanog mailing list archives
Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
From: ML-NANOG-Stefan-Jakob <nanog () yacl net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:14:49 +0000
Hi Mark, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> schrieb am So., 28. Feb. 2016 07:13:
On 3/Feb/16 09:58, Nick Hilliard wrote:Typically the features that fall by the wayside first are: reasonable port buffers, qos knobs and decent lag/ecmp hashing support for mpls packets.Cisco, in general, are suffering here, i.e., QoS on LAG's. IOS, IOS XE and IOS XR suffer massively. We find that Junos does a better job here. Mark.
Do yo have more details what's wrong with the XR platform? Which hardware do we talk about and which XR version is your statement applying? Rgds, Stefan
Current thread:
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge ML-NANOG-Stefan-Jakob (Mar 20)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Mark Tinka (Mar 16)