nanog mailing list archives
Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:40:28 +0200
On 15/Mar/16 20:14, ML-NANOG-Stefan-Jakob wrote:
Do yo have more details what's wrong with the XR platform? Which hardware do we talk about and which XR version is your statement applying?
Well, as it turns out, I just found out and confirmed that since IOS XE 3.12S and later, Cisco introduced a new feature called Aggregate EtherChannel Quality of Service: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/qos_mqc/configuration/xe-3s/asr1000/qos-mqc-xe-3s-asr1000-book/qos-mqc-xe-3s-asr1000-book_chapter_01011.html With this, you can now apply a QoS policy on a LAG port and it will work with (almost) all QoS features without you needing to apply the policies on the LAG member links. I still need to spend some more time testing the policing side of things, particularly how the data plane is programmed re: carving of configured bandwidth across member ports in the LAG. I also see some good work being done on the ASR920 platform (also an IOS XE-based system), as per below: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr920/configuration/guide/qos/qos-guidelines-xe-3-13-asr920-book.html#ID-1374-00000345 From what I can gather, none of this love has made it to IOS or IOS XR boxes. So quite pleased with what I'm seeing with Cisco so far in this regard... Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge ML-NANOG-Stefan-Jakob (Mar 20)
- Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge Mark Tinka (Mar 16)