nanog mailing list archives
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: Peter Phaal <peter.phaal () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:18:38 -0800
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
On 29/Feb/16 12:15, Nikolay Shopik wrote:Cisco Nexus switches support sflow, since they are broadcom based.Not all of them, just the Nexus 9000, IIRC.
The situation in the Cisco Nexus line is confusing. In addition, to the Nexus 9000 series, the Nexus 3000 series and 3100 series are also Broadcom based and also support sFlow. The Nexus 3500 series and 6000 series use Cisco ASICs and don't have sFlow or NetFlow support. It also appears that Cisco's merchant silicon based switches have a greater variety of orchestration capabilities, Python, NX-API, Ansible, etc.
Current thread:
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nikolay Shopik (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)