nanog mailing list archives
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 17:30:51 +0000
Peter Phaal wrote:
The Nexus 3200 should work well with 100G flows - I believe it's based on the latest Broadcom Tomahawk ASIC. The older Trident II ASICs in the Nexus 9k are 40g parts
does nx-os still force ingress-and-egress sflow? sflow is pretty useless you can define an accounting perimeter, which means that you need either ingress across the board, or egress. ingress-and-egress is basically useless because you end up double counting everything. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nikolay Shopik (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Mar 01)