nanog mailing list archives
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: Nikolay Shopik <shopik+lists () nvcube net>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 18:07:12 +0300
On 01/03/16 10:44, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
But unfortunately they (Cisco Nexus) are pretty expensive and fairly new for DC and ISP market. It's pretty rare to find big company with switching backbone on Nexus switches.
You could go with withbox switches, which is based on same broadcom ASIC, but this means you have to deal with new commercial NOS and learn its quirks. Or you could hack around with OpenSwitch and ask Broadcom to include you favorite vendor/model into OpenNSL, so you could actually use ASIC w/o siging NDA.
Current thread:
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX, (continued)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Josh Reynolds (Mar 01)