nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 deployment excuses
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:55:47 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
We will tell you to use IPv6 for that or make you pay extra for a dedicated IPv4 address.
That is a good solution to that problem. I hope all ISPs implementing A+P protocols does that. It also puts a monthly cost that teleworkers have to pay (or their employers have to pay) for not supporting IPv6 on their enterprise solutions. Hopefully that'll drive IPv6 interest in the enterprise space as well.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Filip Hruska (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Baldur Norddahl (Jul 04)
- IPv6 deployment excuses Ca By (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Baldur Norddahl (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ca By (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Baldur Norddahl (Jul 05)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 05)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Spencer Ryan (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mike Hammett (Jul 05)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Matt Hoppes (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)