nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 deployment excuses
From: Matt Hoppes <mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 22:32:47 -0400
Jared, The issue I have with the whole DNS IPv6 thing is IPs are static (on infrastructure), DNS can get munged up and is another database we have to maintain. So now rather than just maintaining an IP database we have to maintain a database for DNS to IP and the IP. And Ina subscriber network things like cpe12232.domain.com are worthless for identifying the end user so I'm referencing the Ip back to something else anyway.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ca By (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Baldur Norddahl (Jul 05)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 05)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Spencer Ryan (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mike Hammett (Jul 05)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Matt Hoppes (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Alarig Le Lay (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Hugo Slabbert (Jul 01)
- RE: IPv6 deployment excuses Gary Wardell (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ruairi Carroll (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses William Astle (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Denis Fondras (Jul 02)