nanog mailing list archives

Re: New ICANN registrant change process


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 15:48:49 -0400

On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:23:04 -0400, Christopher Morrow said:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:

Seems to me that the proper thing to be done would have been for
Registries to deauthorize registrars on the grounds of continuous streams
of complaints.


<devils advocate hat>
On what metric? Pure volume? Percent of registrations? type of complaint by
similar x/y?
</devils advocate hat>

there are 'lots of complaints' against some registrars, but if you have
~20% of the .TLD market you're prone to get more volume than a 1%er, right?
Also, this isn't REALLY the registrY's problem is it?

Jay definitely said 'registRARS'.  And yes, it *is* the registrar's problem
to ensure they aren't selling thousands of domain registrations to known
spammers and other miscreants.

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: