nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent & Google IPv6
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:48:24 -0500
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:48:22 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
And Ricky is wrong, the vast majority of prefixes Cogent routes have zero dollars behind them. Cogent gets paid by customers, not peers. (At least not the big ones.)
Show me a single connection to Cogent for which Cogent isn't being paid. Cogent is the only provider I've ever heard of that will not do any form of settlement-free peering.
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6, (continued)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Baldur Norddahl (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Paras Jha (Feb 24)
- RE: Cogent & Google IPv6 Damien Burke (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Ricky Beam (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Ricky Beam (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Randy Bush (Feb 25)