nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent & Google IPv6
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:18:24 -0500
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:46:56 -0500, Matt Hoppes <mhoppes () indigowireless com> wrote:
Isn't that how the Internet is suppose to work?
Perhaps. But that's not how *Cogent* works. They have a very idiotic view of "Tier 1". They have no transit connections with anyone; someone is paying them for every prefix they accept.
Translation: No one in their right mind does business with Cogent.
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6, (continued)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Matthew D. Hardeman (Feb 25)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Randy Bush (Feb 25)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Constantine A. Murenin (Feb 25)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Baldur Norddahl (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Paras Jha (Feb 24)
- RE: Cogent & Google IPv6 Damien Burke (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Ricky Beam (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Ricky Beam (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Randy Bush (Feb 25)