nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
From: Damien Burke <damien () supremebytes com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:50:17 +0000
Cogent, Can you stop peering with Verizon in the meantime? Please? D: -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Fred Hollis Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 10:25 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Yes, it's a global Cogent problem. We are in contact with them as well and were told that they're aware of that but can't do anything about it on their own.
Dear Cogent Customer, Cogent NOC team has been working with Verizon as well as Google to assist with resolving the issue. After further investigation there is no issue on the Cogent network which is causing the issue that you are seeing. Currently we have asked for Google and Verizon to work together to assist with resolving the issue which has been isolated to their end of the spectrum. As you can see, this issue is beyond Cogent control nevertheless, we continue pushing to get it resolve. We will provide you with further updates as they arise.
I am getting a "Destination unreachable" from their closest router. We did rerouting through a different carrier, so not a big problem for us, but still annoying.
# ping6 ipv6.google.com PING ipv6.google.com(dfw06s47-in-x0e.1e100.net) 56 data bytes From te0-0-0-1.rcr12.sea03.atlas.cogentco.com icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: No route
On 18.02.2016 at 07:01 Damien Burke wrote:
I am currently having a issue with cogent and google over ipv6. My traceroute seems to hit cogent, Verizon, and then just dies. I have a case open with both and each tells me the other is working on it. -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Max Tulyev Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 1:35 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue If my telepathy still works fine and I understood your question well - then the answer is "NO, that is not a global well-known issue" ;) On 17.02.16 18:15, Fred Hollis wrote:Anyone else aware of it?
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue, (continued)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Todd Underwood (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Niels Bakker (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Nick Hilliard (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue jim deleskie (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Todd Underwood (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Christopher Morrow (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Todd Underwood (Feb 17)
- RE: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Damien Burke (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Fred Hollis (Feb 17)
- RE: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Damien Burke (Feb 17)