Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue

[Todd Underwood <toddunder () gmail com>]

let me try to be more concrete and helpful:

lots of people who work at google *and* at cogent are on this list.
none of them are doing anything to look at anything right now b/c
there are no facts in evidence yet.

if you want help with something or want to verify something, provide a
time, a date, a path, a fact, a traceroute, a flow, a log entry a
clue.

cheers,

t

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:54 AM, jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com> wrote:
> They haven't been since at least the mid 90's :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
> > Todd Underwood wrote:
> > > Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data?
> >
> > are facts or data strictly necessary on the nanog mailing list?
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > > T
> > > On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" <fred () web2objects com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone else aware of it?