nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
From: Max Tulyev <maxtul () netassist ua>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:35:23 +0200
If my telepathy still works fine and I understood your question well - then the answer is "NO, that is not a global well-known issue" ;) On 17.02.16 18:15, Fred Hollis wrote:
Anyone else aware of it?
Current thread:
- Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Fred Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Todd Underwood (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Niels Bakker (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Nick Hilliard (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue jim deleskie (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Todd Underwood (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Christopher Morrow (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Todd Underwood (Feb 17)
- RE: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Damien Burke (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Fred Hollis (Feb 17)
- RE: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Damien Burke (Feb 17)