nanog mailing list archives
Re: link avoidance
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 20:35:46 -0400
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
a fellow researcher wants > to make the case that in some scenarios it is very important for a > network operator to be able to specify that traffic should *not* > traverse a certain switch/link/group of switches/group of links > (that's true right?). Could you give some examples? Perhaps point > me to relevant references? if so, why? security? congestion? other? but is it common? and, if
'Level3 Maintenance for Fiber path X on date Y' where 'fiber path x' is one of your paths from A to B. Gracefully move traffic (isis/ospf/rip/etc metric jackery), return traffic when the crisis is past.
so, how do you do it? randy
Current thread:
- link avoidance Randy Bush (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance William Herrin (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance Matthew Kaufman (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance Jimmy Hess (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance Owen DeLong (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance Christopher Morrow (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance Scott Whyte (May 06)
- [no subject] Steve Dodd via NANOG (May 07)