nanog mailing list archives
Re: link avoidance
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 19:28:43 -0500
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at> wrote:
On 5/6/2015 3:56 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I don't think it is common, but I have a microwave network made up of a combination of license-free links and amateur radio band links (where no commercial traffic is permitted). For now the ham-band links are stubs, so
Are such Ham links actually of any real use, since encoded traffic such as SSH/SSL would be verboten, due to Part97 rules against transmitting any message encoded in order to obscure the message? Also, with general network traffic.. If someone wants to request a Google search. There is no way of a router knowing if the requestor is sending the packet for a commercial purpose or for a non-pecuniary allowed usage, until TCP gets some new packet fields... You can be visiting somepizzaplace.example.com, And it's non-commercial allowed use, if you're ordering a pizza for personal consumption, But those same packets are prohibited pecuniary use, if sending those packets to order a pizza to share with a business client.
that's easy. But we're looking at using MPLS with link coloring so that as
Perhaps a browser plugin to add a 'Selection' dropdown for each Web Browser Tab and have a RESTful API to send connection information from the client to an Openflow controller for deciding which forwarding label to push at ingress.
Matthew Kaufman
-- -JH
Current thread:
- link avoidance Randy Bush (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance William Herrin (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance Matthew Kaufman (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance Jimmy Hess (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance Owen DeLong (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance Christopher Morrow (May 06)
- Re: link avoidance Scott Whyte (May 06)
- [no subject] Steve Dodd via NANOG (May 07)