nanog mailing list archives
Re:
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab com>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 19:23:18 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 5/7/2015 7:11 PM, Ted Cooper wrote:
On 08/05/15 11:58, Mike Hammett via NANOG wrote:I've seen the same over here and also considered it weird.It looks exactly like the the DMARC senders treatment - I think there's something wiggy and everyone is being treated as a DMARC encumbered sender.
I'm on a gazillion lists, and this is the only one which seems to have this particularly annoying problem. - - ferg - -- Paul Ferguson PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlVMHhYACgkQKJasdVTchbIy+wEAzjAATu8LDTLVTBKPDIY/joKi 4/UXTi0ZS2cnlnp1SWQA/A4ZpErA6z05UiaQ6/J+Hyaw07tcY+PNowhIjKEJP6Fc =IFIY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- [no subject] Paul Ferguson via NANOG (May 07)
- [no subject] Mike Hammett via NANOG (May 07)
- [no subject] Nathan Angelacos via NANOG (May 07)
- [no subject] Nathan Angelacos via NANOG (May 07)
- Re: Christopher Morrow (May 07)
- Re: Ted Cooper (May 07)
- Re: Paul Ferguson (May 07)
- Re: Paul Ferguson (May 07)
- [no subject] Mike Hammett via NANOG (May 07)
- [no subject] Joel Esler (jesler) via NANOG (May 07)
- [no subject] Mark Andrews (May 07)
- RE: Keith Medcalf (May 09)
- Re: Jim Popovitch (May 09)
- Re: Stephen Satchell (May 09)
- Re: [probably spam, from "NANOG" <nanog-bounces () nanog org>] John Levine (May 09)
- RE: [probably spam, from "NANOG" <nanog-bounces () nanog org>] Keith Medcalf (May 09)
- RE: Keith Medcalf (May 09)