nanog mailing list archives
Re:
From: Ted Cooper <ml-nanog090304q () elcsplace com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 12:11:49 +1000
On 08/05/15 11:58, Mike Hammett via NANOG wrote:
I've seen the same over here and also considered it weird.
It looks exactly like the the DMARC senders treatment - I think there's something wiggy and everyone is being treated as a DMARC encumbered sender.
Current thread:
- [no subject] Paul Ferguson via NANOG (May 07)
- [no subject] Mike Hammett via NANOG (May 07)
- [no subject] Nathan Angelacos via NANOG (May 07)
- [no subject] Nathan Angelacos via NANOG (May 07)
- Re: Christopher Morrow (May 07)
- Re: Ted Cooper (May 07)
- [no subject] Mike Hammett via NANOG (May 07)
- [no subject] Joel Esler (jesler) via NANOG (May 07)
- [no subject] Mark Andrews (May 07)
- RE: Keith Medcalf (May 09)
- Re: Jim Popovitch (May 09)
- Re: Stephen Satchell (May 09)
- Re: [probably spam, from "NANOG" <nanog-bounces () nanog org>] John Levine (May 09)
- RE: [probably spam, from "NANOG" <nanog-bounces () nanog org>] Keith Medcalf (May 09)
- RE: Keith Medcalf (May 09)