nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 03:09:07 +0100
On 5 December 2015 at 02:43, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
Or, if you feel that Cogent's stubborn insistence on partitioning the global v6 internetif A does not peer with B, then for all A and B they are evil partitioners? can we lower the rhetoric?
They both loses on this. In fact anyone claiming tier 1 status loses here, because this illustrates why you can never be single homed on a tier 1 network. These guys simply do not have the full internet. Regards, Baldur
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric William Herrin (Dec 05)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jared Mauch (Dec 06)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric William Herrin (Dec 06)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matthew Petach (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matt Palmer (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jared Mauch (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Randy Bush (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matthew Petach (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Randy Bush (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Baldur Norddahl (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Paul S. (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Josh Reynolds (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Paul S. (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matthew Petach (Dec 06)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Baldur Norddahl (Dec 06)