Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

[William Herrin <bill () herrin us>]

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:
> > On Dec 6, 2015, at 2:56 AM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
> > > Where the definition of Full Table is everything that isn’t exclusively behind Cogent.
> > I thought that was a full table in IPv4 as well?
>
> The disjoint is IPv4 they can reach each other, but the relationships that exist for IPv4 aren’t all dual-stacked 
> with congruent policies.

Hi Jared,

I was being sarcastic. I would never accept Cogent as my sole service
provider because they have a history of getting in to arguments which
leave their customers with only a partial view of the Internet. In
IPv6 -AND- IPv4. As far as I'm concerned, anyone exclusively on Cogent
isn't fully on the Internet and it's not my problem to get them there.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>