nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 10:43:22 +0900
Or, if you feel that Cogent's stubborn insistence on partitioning the global v6 internet
if A does not peer with B, then for all A and B they are evil partitioners? can we lower the rhetoric? randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jared Mauch (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matthew Petach (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Owen DeLong (Dec 05)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric William Herrin (Dec 05)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jared Mauch (Dec 06)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric William Herrin (Dec 06)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jared Mauch (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matthew Petach (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matt Palmer (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jared Mauch (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Randy Bush (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matthew Petach (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Randy Bush (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Baldur Norddahl (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Paul S. (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Josh Reynolds (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Paul S. (Dec 04)