nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?
From: Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 20:08:38 -0500
Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> writes:
On 1 November 2014 23:18, Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com> wrote:Where on the public Internet? Do networks run by organizations such as SITA, ARINC, BT Radianz, UK MOD, and US DOD that use globally unique space and may interconnect with each other in some way (and could hypothetically be using IRR-type structures to describe that routing policy though I don't think the military does that) get their objects unceremoniously booted?Why would I want routes from US DOD in my filters, if this stuff is not supposed to be on the public internet? That is a waste of everyones ressources.
If you (and they) use the full capabilities of RPSL... you won't. -r
Current thread:
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jared Mauch (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jimmy Hess (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Rob Seastrom (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Baldur Norddahl (Nov 02)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Rob Seastrom (Nov 02)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jimmy Hess (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jared Mauch (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Ca By (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Tim Howe (Nov 01)