nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?
From: Tim Howe <tim.h () bendtel com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 09:57:55 -0700
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:51:59 -0500 Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote: [snip]People tend to treat things like IRR (eg: RADB, etc) as a garbage pit you toss things into and never remove from.So who do we ask about making IRRs expire defunct objects and/or changing their system design to ensure that the legitimate resource holder can remove references to their prefix from ASes they no longer authorize to carry them, without requiring all sorts of assistance, cooperation, and willingness from the AS maintainer? :)
I have been asking the folks who manage the maintnr object in question. I have so far been mostly successful. I spend varying amounts of time explaining myself... /Sometimes/ simply pasting the object in an email to the right person is all that is needed. --TimH
Current thread:
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jared Mauch (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jimmy Hess (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Rob Seastrom (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Baldur Norddahl (Nov 02)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Rob Seastrom (Nov 02)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jimmy Hess (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jared Mauch (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Ca By (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Tim Howe (Nov 01)