nanog mailing list archives
Re: arin representation
From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:40:27 +0000
On Mar 24, 2014, at 12:20 PM, "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund () medline com> wrote:
Exactly right John. I think the term "owned" is a problem here. It seems to me that the terms would correctly be "holder" or who the address space was issued to or "user" being the end user using that space.
We use address holder to recognize the party with the rights to the address block.
Wouldn't all of the holders be ARIN members unless grandfathered in?
If you are an ISP who has an ARIN-issued allocation, you are a member. If you have an end-user assignment or legacy block, you can be a member, but it is not automatic. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
Current thread:
- arin representation Randy Bush (Mar 23)
- Re: arin representation John Curran (Mar 23)
- RE: arin representation Naslund, Steve (Mar 23)
- Re: arin representation Randy Bush (Mar 23)
- RE: arin representation Naslund, Steve (Mar 23)
- Re: arin representation Randy Bush (Mar 23)
- RE: arin representation Naslund, Steve (Mar 23)
- Re: arin representation John Curran (Mar 23)
- RE: arin representation Naslund, Steve (Mar 23)
- RE: arin representation Naslund, Steve (Mar 23)
- Re: arin representation John Curran (Mar 23)
- Re: arin representation John Curran (Mar 23)
- Re: arin representation Timothy Morizot (Mar 23)
- Re: arin representation Randy Bush (Mar 23)
- Re: arin representation John Curran (Mar 23)
- Re: arin representation John Curran (Mar 24)
- Message not available
- Re: arin representation Randy Bush (Mar 24)
- Re: arin representation John Curran (Mar 24)
- RE: arin representation Naslund, Steve (Mar 24)
- Re: arin representation Randy Bush (Mar 24)
- Re: arin representation Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: arin representation Doug Barton (Mar 28)