nanog mailing list archives
Re: MACsec SFP
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:40:18 +0300
On (2014-06-25 05:09 -0700), Eric Flanery (eric) wrote:
That said, I do think the separately tunable tunable transmitters and receivers could be huge, especially if they came at only a reasonably small
I don't think this technology exists. The receivers are always wideband and there is some filter in optical mux or in BX optic to avoid receiving reflections of your own TX. Not sure if tunable filter exists. But you can today buy BX optics which work on same wavelength, so you can use same part in both ends of the connection. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: MACsec SFP, (continued)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Eric Flanery (eric) (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Eric Flanery (eric) (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Tim Durack (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Randy Bush (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Randy Bush (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Aris Lambrianidis (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP John Schiel (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 25)