nanog mailing list archives
Re: MACsec SFP
From: Pieter Hulshoff <phulshof () aimvalley nl>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 07:57:40 +0200
On 25-06-14 04:57, Aris Lambrianidis wrote:
How much ahead of my time would I be if I was to ask for CFP/CFP2 transceivers supporting MACsec? (at a reasonably competitive price)
So far, most requests I got were for 1 Gbps, and some for 10 Gbps. You're the first to mention 100 Gbps, so my guess is that you're ahead of the curve. Frankly, we're still in the process of designing 10 Gbps in this format, and don't have a CFP platform for smart S/CFPs ready yet, but I'll certainly keep it in mind, especially if more people show interest. Some of our larger customers may be interested in it, so I'll check with them.
Kind regards, Pieter Hulshoff
Current thread:
- Re: MACsec SFP, (continued)
- Re: MACsec SFP Eric Flanery (eric) (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Eric Flanery (eric) (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Tim Durack (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Randy Bush (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Randy Bush (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Aris Lambrianidis (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP John Schiel (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Tim Durack (Jun 25)
- RE: MACsec SFP Michael O Holstein (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Glen Turner (Jun 29)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 29)