nanog mailing list archives
RE: MACsec SFP
From: Michael O Holstein <michael.holstein () csuohio edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:45:07 +0000
protocol was that communicated this information down to the SFP
For EEPROM access in a SFP+ it's I2C with is well documented and used in tons of embedded stuff .. commercial logic analysis tools can handle this protocol, as can your average $10 Arudrino. Of course writing certain parts of the SFP+ EEPROM are "protected" for obvious reasons but that certainly hasn't stopped people. Cheers, Michael Holstein Cleveland State University
Current thread:
- Re: MACsec SFP, (continued)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Randy Bush (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Aris Lambrianidis (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP John Schiel (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Tim Durack (Jun 25)
- RE: MACsec SFP Michael O Holstein (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Glen Turner (Jun 29)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 29)
- Re: MACsec SFP Glen Turner (Jun 30)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 30)