nanog mailing list archives

Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects

From: Job Snijders <job.snijders () hibernianetworks com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:04:48 +0100

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 08:58:06AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:

    IRRToolset 5.0.1 (rtconfig really) finally gave out on a pretty
messy RPSL parse.

    After a few hours of research, it seems that its dead since 2009 :(.

    There is some effort at http://irrtoolset.isc.org to reboot
development, its pretty dead since 2012-07-31.

    Beside home made solutions, there seems to be no commercial package.

    Any lead will be appreciated.


I really like bgpq3 for prefix-filter generation. 

    http://github.com/snar/bgpq3
    http://snar.spb.ru/prog/bgpq3/

Kind regards,

Job

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Job Snijders (Jan 30)
  - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Tore Anderson (Jan 30)
    - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
    - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Darren O'Connor (Jan 30)
    - While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects ML (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Nick Hilliard (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)