nanog mailing list archives
Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed?
From: Martin T <m4rtntns () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:51:59 +0200
Hi, for example there is a small company with /22 IPv4 allocation from RIPE in European region. This company is dual-homed and would like to announce 4x /24 prefixes to both ISPs. Both ISP's update their prefix-lists automatically based on records in RIPE database. For example Level3 uses this practice at least in Europe. If this small company creates a "route" object for it's /22 allocation, then is it enough? Theoretically this would cover all four /24 networks. Or in which situation it is useful/needed to have "route" object for each /24 prefix? regards, Martin
Current thread:
- Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Job Snijders (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Tore Anderson (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Darren O'Connor (Jan 30)
- While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects ML (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Nick Hilliard (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Tore Anderson (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Job Snijders (Jan 30)