nanog mailing list archives

Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects

From: Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:47:38 -0500

    Yes, its the first thing I tried.

    Iti's still ~82k =D

    The as-set included some of his peering as export too.

    We're both looking into it.

-----
Alain Hebert                                ahebert () pubnix net   
PubNIX Inc.        
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443

On 01/31/14 11:38, Job Snijders wrote:

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:

    bgpq3 works great the as-set that was borking rtlookup generate a
~183k long prefix list =D.

I recommend using it like this, to enable aggregation where possible: bgpq3 -A 

Kind regards,

Job

Current thread:

Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed?, (continued)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Job Snijders (Jan 30)
  - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Tore Anderson (Jan 30)
    - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
    - Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Darren O'Connor (Jan 30)
    - While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects ML (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Nick Hilliard (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
    - Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)