nanog mailing list archives
Re: responding to DMARC breakage
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:10:42 -0400
William Herrin wrote:
Doesn't really help if someone upstream is publishing the records, and its someone downstream who's acting on them.On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net> wrote:What kind of responses are available? In the broader scope of things, what kinds of responses are typical if someone publishes corrupted information and then doesn't cooperate in fixing the situation - be that through obliviousness, incompetence, lack of resources, laziness, or active intent (criminal or not)?1. Treat DMARC records which break mailing lists as malformed. 2. Treat messages with malformed DMARC records as a validation failure and act as directed for validation failures. -Bill
-- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Current thread:
- responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage William Herrin (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Dave Crocker (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Matthew Petach (Apr 13)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 13)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage William Herrin (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Joly MacFie (Apr 12)