nanog mailing list archives
Re: responding to DMARC breakage
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:49:04 -0400
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:12:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman said:
It occurs to me that Yahoo's deployment of DMARC p=reject, and the choice of several big mail operators to honor that, has created a situation not unlike a really routing table or nameserver, snafu ---
It's more like a peering war. Time for somebody to either bake a cake, or find alternate transit providers.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage William Herrin (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Dave Crocker (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Matthew Petach (Apr 13)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 13)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage William Herrin (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Joly MacFie (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 12)