nanog mailing list archives
Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table?
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 06:44:56 +0200
The forwarding hardware is generally going to be the limit, and that's going to be painful enough as we approach a half million prefixes.True. And that's why we must avoid IPv6.
This is not only wrong, it makes no sense whatsoever. Owen
Current thread:
- /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Michael McConnell (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Majdi S. Abbas (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Masataka Ohta (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Michael McConnell (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Owen DeLong (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Brandon Martin (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Owen DeLong (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? John Curran (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? shawn wilson (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Grzegorz Janoszka (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Owen DeLong (Jun 22)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 24)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Masataka Ohta (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Arturo Servin (Jun 25)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? Majdi S. Abbas (Jun 21)
- Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table? William Herrin (Jun 22)