nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:48:41 +0000
Chris, That's an incorrect draft pointer. Here is the correct one - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-t http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp And no, Cisco has no IPR on MAP wrt the above drafts. Cheers, Rajiv PS: Please do note that the IPRs mostly get nullified once they are through the IETF standards process. -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 3:41 PM To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva () cisco com> Cc: Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>, nanog list <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) <rajiva () cisco com> wrote: Oh, it certainly is (per the IETF IPR rules). which rfcs? I can find a draft in softwire: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation-01 and a reference to this in wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_transition_mechanisms#MAP which says: "...(MAP) is a Cisco IPv6 transition proposal..." so.. err, we won't see this in juniper gear since: 1) not a standard 2) encumbered by IPR issues weee! Thanks for the clarity, Chuck. Cheers, Rajiv -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU> Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 3:18 PM To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva () cisco com> Cc: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>, nanog list <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGNI think he means patent encumbered. On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:13:11PM +0000, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:Chris, UmmmÅ you mean the IPv6 and IPv4 inter-dependency when you say IP encumbered? If so, the answer is Yes. v6 addressing doesn't need to change to accommodate this IPv4 A+P encoding. Cheers, Rajiv -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 2:28 PM To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva () cisco com> Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>, nanog list <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGNOn Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) <rajiva () cisco com> wrote: Yes, MAP (T-Translation or E-Encap mode) is implemented on two regular routers that I know of - ASR9K and ASR1K. Without that, you are rightthatMAP wouldn't have been as beneficial as claimed. glad it's cross platform... is it also IP encumbered so it'll remainjustas 'cross platform' ?
Current thread:
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN, (continued)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Christopher Morrow (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Chuck Anderson (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Christopher Morrow (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Chuck Anderson (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Christopher Morrow (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Tom Taylor (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Tom Taylor (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 07)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Owen DeLong (Apr 07)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Apr 08)
- Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Chris Adams (Apr 08)