nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN


From: Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:18:10 -0400

I think he means patent encumbered.

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:13:11PM +0000, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
Chris,

UmmmÅ  you mean the IPv6 and IPv4 inter-dependency when you say IP
encumbered?

If so, the answer is Yes. v6 addressing doesn't need to change to
accommodate this IPv4 A+P encoding.


Cheers,
Rajiv

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 2:28 PM
To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva () cisco com>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>, nanog list <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN


On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
<rajiva () cisco com> wrote:

Yes, MAP (T-Translation or E-Encap mode) is implemented on two regular
routers that I know of - ASR9K and ASR1K. Without that, you are right that
MAP wouldn't have been as beneficial as claimed.





glad it's cross platform... is it also IP encumbered so it'll remain just
as 'cross platform' ?


Current thread: